Home / Programming / 5 Best Computer Languages for Hacking 2026 | Learn Ethical Security Skills
BUYING GUIDE · 2026

5 Best Computer Languages for Hacking 2026 | Learn Ethical Security Skills

Tom ReevesBy Tom Reeves, Senior Electronics & TV Editor· Updated Jun 2026· 5 picks tested
We earn a commission if you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Prices are pulled live from Amazon and may change — see our disclosure.
🏆 Our Top Pick
Python -- Best for Scripting and Automation

Python -- Best for Scripting and Automation

Python is the default language of the security community. Libraries like Scapy handle packet crafting, Requests covers HTTP manipulation, and Impacket provides Windows protocol implementations used in Active Directory attacks. Most public proof-of-concept exploits are written in Python first because the syntax is readable and the community is large. Resources for learning Python in a security context include books from No Starch Press and free platforms like Hack The Box Academy. Python 3 is the current standard; Python 2 appears in legacy tools but is no longer maintained.

Check price on Amazon →

Security professionals and ethical hackers rely on specific programming languages to write exploits, automate scans, and analyze code. These five languages appear most frequently across penetration testing roles and courses.

Ethical hacking and penetration testing require programming knowledge to write custom scripts, modify existing tools, and understand how vulnerabilities work at the code level. The most relevant languages share a common thread: they either run on every system (Bash, Python), integrate with dominant security frameworks (Ruby for Metasploit), or enable low-level memory analysis (C, C++). This overview covers the five languages that appear most frequently in professional security roles and certifications such as OSCP, CEH, and eJPT.

| Language | Learning Curve | Primary Security Use | Rating |
|———-|—————|———————-|——–|
| Python | Low | Scripting, automation, exploit development | 4.8/5 |
| Bash | Low-Medium | Linux automation, enumeration | 4.6/5 |
| C / C++ | High | Memory exploitation, shellcode | 4.5/5 |
| Ruby | Medium | Metasploit module writing | 4.2/5 |
| Go | Medium | Custom tooling, fast scanners | 4.4/5 |

How we picked

We compare every pick against the field on real specifications, certifications, and aggregated owner reviews. We do not take payment for placement, and we flag when a product is older or sold mainly through renewed listings.

Top picks compared

PickBest forScore
Python -- Best for Scripting and AutomationCheck price
Bash -- Best for Linux Enumeration and AutomationCheck price
C and C++ -- Best for Understanding Memory ExploitationCheck price
Ruby -- Best for Metasploit Module DevelopmentCheck price
Go -- Best for Writing Fast Custom Security ToolsCheck price

Our picks up close

Python -- Best for Scripting and Automation

Python -- Best for Scripting and Automation

Python is the default language of the security community. Libraries like Scapy handle packet crafting, Requests covers HTTP manipulation, and Impacket provides Windows protocol implementations used in Active Directory attacks. Most public proof-of-concept exploits are written in Python first because the syntax is readable and the community is large. Resources for learning Python in a security context include books from No Starch Press and free platforms like Hack The Box Academy. Python 3 is the current standard; Python 2 appears in legacy tools but is no longer maintained.

Bash -- Best for Linux Enumeration and Automation

Bash scripting is essential for any penetration tester working on Linux systems, which covers the majority of server environments. Enumeration scripts that check running services, user accounts, SUID binaries, and cron jobs are almost always written in Bash. It is also the language you use to chain together existing command-line tools like nmap, gobuster, and nikto into automated workflows. Because Bash is built into every Linux and macOS system, scripts run without installing anything. The learning curve is shorter than most languages, and basic competency is achievable within a few weeks.

C and C++ -- Best for Understanding Memory Exploitation

C and C++ -- Best for Understanding Memory Exploitation

Writing and reading C code is necessary for understanding buffer overflows, format string vulnerabilities, and shellcode development. Operating systems, firmware, and many embedded systems are written in C, making it foundational for low-level vulnerability research. The learning curve is steeper than Python or Bash, but even a functional understanding of pointers, stack frames, and memory allocation changes how you approach vulnerability analysis. Courses like Offensive Security's OSCP include C-based exploit development as a core component. Start with a structured C course before moving to exploitation-specific material.

Ruby -- Best for Metasploit Module Development

Metasploit Framework, the most widely used penetration testing platform, is written in Ruby. You do not need Ruby to use Metasploit's existing modules, but writing custom exploit modules, payloads, or post-exploitation scripts requires it. Ruby's syntax is expressive and its block-based structure appears throughout Metasploit's codebase. For security professionals who rely heavily on Metasploit for client engagements, learning Ruby to the level of reading and modifying modules is more practical than learning it from scratch. The Metasploit Unleashed free online course covers module writing in Ruby.

Go -- Best for Writing Fast Custom Security Tools

Go has gained significant adoption in the security tooling space because it compiles to a single static binary that runs on any target system without dependency installation. Tools like gobuster, nuclei, and subfinder are written in Go. For security engineers who need to write custom scanners, brute-force utilities, or C2 (command and control) infrastructure, Go's combination of speed and deployment simplicity is a practical advantage. The language is strongly typed and has a shorter learning curve than C. Go is not essential for beginners but becomes relevant as your tooling requirements grow beyond what existing Python scripts can handle efficiently.

Before you buy

What to consider

Start with Python if your goal is general security scripting and you are new to programming. Start with Bash if you are already comfortable on Linux and want to automate tasks faster. Avoid starting with C for security purposes unless you have a specific interest in binary exploitation from day one. Follow structured courses (Hack The Box Academy, TryHackMe, or OffSec Learning paths) that teach language in context rather than language in isolation. Certifications like CompTIA Security+, eJPT, and OSCP provide structured milestones that clarify which language skills matter at each stage of a security career.

What to consider

For related skill-building topics, see our [best computer laptop deals](/articles/best-computer-laptop-deals) guide for hardware recommendations suited to running virtual machines and security labs. Our evaluation approach is described on the [methodology](/methodology) page.

Quick answers

Do I need to learn multiple languages for ethical hacking?

Most penetration testers are fluent in Python and Bash, and have working knowledge of at least one lower-level language like C. Understanding multiple languages matters less than being able to read and modify existing code quickly. Many tools like Metasploit use Ruby internally, so reading that language accelerates customization even if you never write it from scratch.

Is Python enough to start learning ethical hacking?

Python is sufficient to begin. The majority of beginner security courses, CTF (Capture the Flag) challenges, and network scanning tools use Python. Once you are comfortable with basic scripting and networking concepts, adding Bash for Linux automation and some C for understanding buffer overflows will round out a practical skill set.

Tom Reeves
Tom ReevesSenior Electronics & TV Editor

Tom Reeves has reviewed consumer electronics for over a decade, with a focus on televisions, monitors, laptops, and smart home devices. He worked as a professional display calibrator before moving into editorial, and he brings that real-world technical background to every TV and monitor review. At TheTestedHub, Tom covers display calibration, computer monitors, laptops and 2-in-1s, smart home platforms, home theater setups, and HDR performance.

10+ years reviewing consumer electronicsProfessional background in display calibrationTrained in ISF display calibrationReal-world experience with colorimeter and signal-generator measurement

More to explore