Why we tested the Philips Premium Airfryer XXL
Philips invented the air fryer category in 2010. That’s not marketing - Philips holds the original patents on the forced-hot-air rapid-circulation cooking method that the entire category is built on. More than 15 years later, every air fryer from every brand is essentially a derivative of what Philips developed. So when Philips releases a premium flagship at $250 - more than double what good competitors cost - the question worth investigating is: does the original inventor still make the best version?
After two months of testing, the answer is largely yes, with some caveats worth understanding before you spend $250.
The Premium Airfryer XXL targets a specific buyer: someone who cooks with an air fryer five or more times a week, wants the best possible cooking results, and values appliances built to last a decade rather than two years. For that buyer, the price is defensible. For occasional users, it’s genuinely hard to justify against the COSORI or Ninja.
The Fat Removal Technology is the headline feature - a proprietary basket design that allows rendered fat to drip away from food during cooking rather than pooling around it. We were skeptical before testing. We were less skeptical afterward.
How we tested
We ran the full 40+ session protocol plus additional fat measurement tests specifically for the Philips. For fat extraction, we cooked eight identical bone-in chicken thighs simultaneously in the Philips and the COSORI Pro LE, using identical seasoning and cook settings (375°F, 25 minutes). After cooking, we collected and measured the fat in each drip tray using a kitchen scale, then repeated the test three times to average results.
We also ran the browning uniformity test with more data points for the Philips - 12 potato wedge pieces instead of 8, measured across four quadrants - to properly evaluate the Twin TurboStar airflow system’s claims. Build quality assessment included drawer pull-force measurements, hinge flex testing, and inspection of basket coating at weeks 2, 4, and 8. Noise measurement at 12 inches during high-temp operation was logged across five sessions.
Performance
The Philips XXL delivers cooking results that are a measurable step above the competition. In the browning uniformity test, 12 potato wedges showed less than 5% variation in surface browning - the tightest distribution we’ve measured across any air fryer in this review series. The Twin TurboStar technology pushes air in a spiral pattern rather than a simple overhead blast, which means the outer-basket pieces receive the same heat exposure as the center pieces.
The 2225W heating element is significantly more powerful than the 1500W units in most competitors, and the practical effect is faster heat recovery after loading cold food. Where the COSORI needs 90 seconds to recover temperature after you open and load a cold batch, the Philips is back to target temperature in under 45 seconds. For batch cooking, this adds up.
The fat measurement test results were clear: across three identical runs, the Philips collected an average of 18.4 grams of fat per four-thigh batch versus 15.1 grams for the COSORI. That’s 22% more fat removed from the food, with a visibly crisper, less greasy skin result. Chicken wings at 400°F for 20 minutes came out with skins that crackled like pork rinds - the crispiest result we produced across all ten air fryers in this review series.
The noise level was 61 dB peak - quieter than the Ninja and significantly quieter than the Instant Vortex, despite the larger fan needed to move air through the bigger element. The QuickClean basket is as advertised: food release is easier, and the star-shaped bottom leaves nowhere for residue to hide in corners.
Who should buy this
The Philips Premium Airfryer XXL is for daily air fryer cooks who want the best available and are willing to pay for longevity and cooking precision. If you use your air fryer every day, often cook for four or more people, and plan to keep the appliance for five or more years, the math on the $250 price starts to look reasonable - especially compared to buying and replacing two cheaper units over the same period. If you’re new to air frying, cook infrequently, or are testing whether you’ll actually use the appliance regularly, start with the COSORI Pro LE and upgrade later if you find yourself using it daily.
Philips Premium Airfryer XXL vs. the competition
| Product | Verdict |
|---|---|
| COSORI Pro LE 5-Qt | Also Great - buy this instead if $250 is too steep; 85% of the performance for 40% of the price. |
| Instant Vortex Plus 6-Qt | Skip - similar capacity but the Philips' build and fat extraction are in a different league. |
| NuWave Brio 14-Qt | Alternative - if you want oven-format cooking; different use case entirely. |
Full specifications
| Capacity | 3 lbs / ~7 quart |
| Wattage | 2225 W |
| Temperature Range | 170-400°F |
| Dimensions | 15 x 12.4 x 12.4 inches |
| Weight | 17.6 lbs |
See full details on Amazon →
Should you buy the Philips Premium Airfryer XXL?
The Philips XXL is the air fryer you buy when you're done replacing $80 units every two years. The fat extraction technology is real, the construction is industrial-grade, and the cooking results at 400°F are more even and more consistent than anything else in the market at any price point.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Philips Premium Airfryer XXL worth $250 when good air fryers cost $100?+
For daily cooks who use an air fryer as a primary cooking appliance, yes. The build quality difference means you're unlikely to replace it for 5-7 years, amortizing the premium to nearly nothing. For occasional users who air fry once a week, the $100 COSORI is genuinely good enough and the $150 premium is hard to justify.
What is Philips' Fat Removal Technology and does it actually work?+
Fat Removal Technology refers to Philips' basket and drawer geometry, which includes a separate mesh shelf that allows rendered fat to drip down and away from food as it cooks. In our testing, chicken thighs cooked in the Philips produced an average of 22% more collected fat in the drip tray than the same thighs cooked in the COSORI - meaning more fat left the chicken rather than being re-absorbed. The difference was also visible in the final product: Philips thighs had crisper, less greasy skin.
📅 Update log
- May 27, 2026Initial review published.
