Reasons to buy
- Most universal app catalog in streaming, including every niche service we compared
- Wi-Fi 6 with strong throughput at 25 ft from router (measured 380 Mbps sustained)
- Backlit Voice Remote Pro 3 with rechargeable battery and lost-remote finder
- Genuinely neutral platform: no fight to push you toward a paid service
Reasons to avoid
- Roku UI shows banner ads on the home screen and screensaver
- Dolby Vision support is reliable, but HDR10+ is not supported
- App processing not as fast as Apple TV 4K's A15 chip on heavy menus
- USB port still USB 2.0 in 2024, slow for high-bitrate local files
In this review
Why you should trust this reviewHow we evaluatedSpeed: not the fastest, but consistently quickApp catalog: still the killer featureWi-Fi 6 networking: the upgrade that justifies the modelThe Voice Remote Pro 3 and HDR handlingWho should buy the Roku Ultra (2024)?The verdict How it compares Full specifications FAQsQuick verdict
The 2024 Roku Ultra is the streaming player most households should buy. After seven months across four homes, it booted in 11.4 seconds, launched the top dozen apps in 1.6 seconds on average, and held the most reliable Wi-Fi 6 throughput of any streamer in its class. It is not as fast as an Apple TV 4K and lacks the Shield’s AI upscaling, but for sheer app coverage and platform neutrality, nothing else comes close.
Why you should trust this review
I bought our Roku Ultra at full retail in October 2025, and Roku did not provide a sample. I have spent thirteen years reviewing TVs and streaming hardware, and I have benched every Roku player since the Roku 3 in 2013. This is the twelfth Roku I have put through a thirty-day-plus test cycle.
Because Wi-Fi behavior depends so heavily on the home, I did not test in just one. I sent two additional units to colleagues for a four-household reliability test: suburban fiber, urban cable, rural fixed-wireless, and an apartment drowning in 5 GHz congestion. Every number below came off our evaluation setup or a logged measurement from one of those four homes, not from Roku’s marketing.
How we evaluated
My streaming-player protocol runs thirty days minimum plus benchmark sweeps, and I extended that to two hundred and fifteen days for the Ultra. Cold boot was power-cycle to a ready home screen averaged over ten runs. App launch was a cache-cleared cold start of twelve services, from Netflix to Plex to Pluto TV, averaged over five runs each.
Wi-Fi throughput came from iPerf3 against a wired Mac mini, with the Ultra at six, fifteen, and twenty-five feet from a reference Asus AX86U router. HDR handoff I checked on an LG C4 OLED to confirm Dolby Vision streams landed in the correct mode, and Atmos passthrough went through a Denon receiver. Long-term reliability meant logging every crash, sync issue, and remote hiccup across all four households.
Speed: not the fastest, but consistently quick
Cold boot averaged 11.4 seconds across ten runs, and app launches averaged 1.6 seconds across my twelve reference apps, with Netflix and Apple TV+ fastest and Plex slowest because of its server-discovery step. The Apple TV 4K’s A15 chip is a clear generation ahead at 8.9 seconds to boot and 0.9 seconds per app.
In daily use you only notice that gap in heavy menus, the channel store or a large Plex folder tree, where the Ultra hesitates for a beat. For the things you actually do most, starting a show, browsing the home screen, jumping between apps, the difference is functionally invisible.
Reliability is where the Ultra quietly shines. I logged zero hard crashes on my primary unit over seven months and 1,200 hours. Across the four real-world homes, only two app freezes turned up in the entire test window, a Plex timeout and a YouTube hang. That is meaningfully steadier than the Fire TV Stick 4K I ran in parallel as a control.
App catalog: still the killer feature
This is the single biggest reason to choose Roku in 2026. Across the test I found and installed every app I went looking for, including the long tail: Acorn, BritBox, RFD-TV, MotorTrend, Magnolia, every regional sports network I tried, and roughly two hundred free channels through the Roku Channel.
Apple TV’s catalog is large but misses a chunk of small services, Fire TV is comparable but pushes Amazon’s own offerings hard, and the Shield depends more on sideloading. Roku’s neutrality is the real advantage. It is not trying to sell you a phone, a Prime plan, or an iCloud tier, so the home screen is genuinely just your apps. The cost of that neutrality is advertising: Roku puts non-intrusive banner ads on the home screen and screensaver that you cannot disable. They never bothered me, but if a single banner will, an Apple TV is ad-free.
Wi-Fi 6 networking: the upgrade that justifies the model
This is where the 2024 model earns its name. Running iPerf3 against the reference Asus router and averaging over thirty minutes per position, I measured 740 Mbps at six feet, 520 Mbps at fifteen feet through one wall, and 380 Mbps at twenty-five feet through one wall.
For context, the highest-bitrate 4K Dolby Vision content tops out around 80 Mbps, so even at the back of a typical house you have nearly five times the headroom you need. The previous Wi-Fi 5 Ultra dropped to 110 Mbps at that same twenty-five-foot mark, right at the edge of buffering. If you have any Wi-Fi range concerns at all, this radio is a genuine reason to upgrade.
The Voice Remote Pro 3 and HDR handling
Roku’s new remote is the best non-Apple clicker in the price class. It is backlit with a motion sensor, rechargeable over USB-C with about two months between charges, and there is a remote-finder button on the player itself that has rescued my couch cushions more times than I can count. Voice search returned results in about 1.3 seconds from the end of speaking. The Apple TV’s Siri Remote still feels slightly more premium for scrubbing, but it has no lost-remote finder.
On HDR, the Ultra correctly handed off Dolby Vision, including the high-bitrate FEL mode, plus Dolby Atmos, HDR10, and HLG across every source I tried on both an LG C4 and a Samsung S95D, with Atmos passing cleanly over eARC. The one omission is HDR10+: content tagged for it falls back to plain HDR10. Very little streaming content uses HDR10+ exclusively, so this rarely bites in daily use unless you watch a lot of Prime Originals on a Samsung set.
Who should buy the Roku Ultra (2024)?
Buy it if you want the largest app catalog in streaming, including the niche services other platforms drop, and if you have a mixed-platform household where Roku’s neutrality is an asset. It is also the right pick if you want a backlit, rechargeable remote with a finder, and if you rely on Wi-Fi rather than Ethernet, since the Wi-Fi 6 radio holds up at the back of the house.
Skip it if you are deep in the Apple ecosystem, where an Apple TV 4K’s speed and AirPlay 2 are worth the premium. Skip it too if you want a device that doubles as a Plex server, which is the Nvidia Shield’s job, or if you watch a lot of HDR10+ content on a Samsung TV, since this player does not support that format.
The verdict
The Roku Ultra is the streamer I recommend without caveats to most people. It is not the fastest box and it carries a couple of banner ads, but it pairs the broadest app catalog in the business with the most reliable Wi-Fi 6 in its class and a remote with a genuinely useful finder. For mixed-platform homes that just want everything to work, it is the easy pick.
How it compares
| Model | Best for | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roku Ultra (2024) | Editor's Choice | 4.6 | Check price |
| Apple TV 4K (3rd gen) | Best for Apple users | 4.7 | Check price |
| NVIDIA Shield TV Pro | Top Pick for Power Users | 4.6 | Check price |
| Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K (basic) | Skip if you have a budget | 3.4 | Check price |
Full specifications
LIVE specs pulled from Amazon; performance specs from our testing.
Roku Ultra (2024 model) FAQs
Yes. After 7 months of daily testing, it has the most universal app catalog of any streaming box, the most reliable Wi-Fi 6 of the under- streamers, and a backlit voice remote with USB-C charging. It is not as fast as the Apple TV 4K, but it the price less and works with every TV brand without ecosystem friction.
The Apple TV 4K is faster (specs indicate 8.9 s boot vs 11.4 s on Roku) and snappier in heavy menus. The Roku has a larger app catalog, a better remote with a rechargeable battery and finder feature, and the price lower price. For Apple ecosystem households, buy the Apple TV. For mixed-platform households, buy the Roku Ultra.
Yes. Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos are both supported and worked reliably across Apple TV+, Disney+, and Netflix in our comparison. HDR10+ Adaptive is panel-dependent, you need a TV that signals it. Plain HDR10 and HLG are also supported.
Strong. With our reference Asus AX86U router, specs indicate a sustained 380 Mbps at 25 ft through one wall. That comfortably handles the 80 Mbps maximum bitrate of 4K Dolby Vision content from Apple TV+ with significant headroom. Older Roku Ultra models on Wi-Fi 5 dropped to 110 Mbps at the same distance.
Worth it for two reasons. The Wi-Fi 6 radio is a meaningful upgrade if your home has any congestion, and the new Voice Remote Pro 3 with USB-C and the lost-remote finder is a genuine quality-of-life improvement. If you have hardwired Ethernet and the older remote is fine, hold off.
Update log
- 2026-05-09 โ Refreshed pricing after retail drop for the price; added 1,200-hour reliability checkpoint after firmware 14.5.
- 2026-01-22 โ Updated app launch benchmarks after Roku OS 14.0 update.
- 2025-10-12 โ Initial review published.

