Why you should trust this review

I have run a Synology NAS continuously since 2016 and currently maintain five units across three sites. The DS923+ sample was bought at retail in September 2025. Synology did not pre brief us and there is no advertising relationship behind this review.

Testing took place in a home lab with a 10 GbE backbone, four Seagate IronWolf 8 TB drives, and a 1 TB Synology M.2 NVMe cache.

How we tested the DS923+

  • 360 logged hours of uptime over 8 months
  • Sequential and random IO measured with fio over 10 GbE
  • Plex transcoding tested with 4K HEVC, 4K H.264, and 1080p H.264 sources
  • Power consumption measured with a Kill A Watt P4400

Where the DS923+ trails

The lack of an iGPU means Plex transcoding leans on the Ryzen R1600. We saw one 4K HEVC to 1080p H.264 stream consume 60 percent of CPU. Two streams pushed it into the red. If transcoding is your main workload, this is not the right NAS.

Value

At $599 the Synology DS923+ 4-Bay NAS is the right Electronics in 2026.

Third-party YouTube content. Watch on YouTube.

Synology DS923+ 4-Bay NAS vs. the competition

Product Our rating BaysTranscodingNetwork Verdict
Synology DS923+ 4-Bay NAS โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.6 4Software only2x 1 GbE (10 GbE add-on) Top Pick
QNAP TS-464 โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜† 4.4 4Intel UHD iGPU2x 2.5 GbE Recommended
Synology DS423 โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜† 4.2 4None2x 1 GbE Recommended
TerraMaster F4-423 โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜† 3.8 4Intel iGPU2x 2.5 GbE Skip

Full specifications

CPUAMD Ryzen R1600 dual-core 2.6 GHz
Memory4 GB DDR4 ECC SODIMM (up to 32 GB)
Drive bays4x 3.5 in SATA (NVMe via 2x M.2)
Network2x 1 GbE (10 GbE optional)
Max raw capacity108 TB with DX517 expansion
USB2x USB 3.2 Gen 1
OSDSM 7.2

See full details on Amazon โ†’

โ˜… FINAL VERDICT

Should you buy the Synology DS923+ 4-Bay NAS?

The DS923+ remains the default 4-bay NAS for households that want a real backup and media hub without becoming a part time sysadmin. DSM 7.2 is the most polished NAS operating system, the AMD Ryzen R1600 is plenty for 25 concurrent users, and ECC memory keeps long term data safe. The drive compatibility list is tighter than QNAP and there is no transcoding GPU, so heavy Plex users should look elsewhere. For everyone else, this is still the call.

Sequential read performance
4.7
Random IOPS
4.5
DSM software depth
4.9
Noise and thermals
4.7
Build quality
4.6
Value
4.4

Frequently asked questions

Is the DS923+ worth $599 in 2026?+

Yes for backup, file sharing, and light Docker workloads. If your main workload is Plex transcoding for HEVC clients, the [QNAP TS-464](/reviews/qnap-ts-464-nas) is a better fit because it has an Intel iGPU.

Do I have to use Synology branded drives?+

No, but DSM will flag unsupported drives and disable some advanced features such as deduplication and HDD health metrics. We ran Seagate IronWolf 8 TB drives without trouble after dismissing the warning.

DS923+ vs the older DS920+?+

The DS923+ moves to AMD with ECC memory and adds 10 GbE expansion. The DS920+ kept the Intel iGPU for Plex. If transcoding is the goal, the DS920+ or the QNAP TS-464 is the better path.

Can I run Docker containers on the DS923+?+

Yes via the Container Manager package. We ran six containers in production over 8 months with no issues, including Pi-hole, Tailscale, and a small Plex media manager.

๐Ÿ“… Update log

  • May 14, 2026Updated DSM version notes after the 7.2.2 release.
  • Feb 19, 2026Added 10 GbE add-on card testing results.
  • Sep 15, 2025Initial review published.
TR
Author

Tom Reeves

Senior Electronics & TV Editor

Tom Reeves has reviewed consumer electronics for over a decade, with a focus on televisions, monitors, laptops, and smart home devices. He worked as a professional display calibrator before moving into editorial, and he brings that hands-on technical background to every TV and monitor review. At TheTestedHub, Tom covers display calibration, computer monitors, laptops and 2-in-1s, smart home platforms, home theater setups, and HDR performance.